THE JAR IS ALWAYS WITH US



(Buzz Drainpipe, Shelf-Psych dispatch #44)

A jar is never just a jar.
It’s a vessel, a witness, a thing that leaks meaning into its surroundings. Put something in a jar and the object becomes eternal—pickled, suspended, displaced from the flow of life. Cinema, ever obsessed with the containment of dread, returns again and again to jars as occult batteries. In three works, across three decades, we see the jar mutate: from carnival grotesquerie, to farmhouse curse, to VHS fever-dream.

I. THE JAR AS CARNIVAL (1964)

Alfred Hitchcock Hour – “The Jar”

Bradbury’s story filtered through black-and-white television is less about what’s in the glass than what stares into it. The townsfolk project their own nightmares into the murk. A fetus? A monster? A trick? No answer. The jar is a mirror, a traveling sideshow, a Rorschach test that makes yokels philosophers for a moment.

The poor fool who buys it gains sudden clout—he owns the mystery. Owning the unknowable gives him temporary dominion over the known. But it’s a dominion rooted in spectacle: everyone stares, everyone whispers, the community’s grotesque heart exposed.

Here the jar is a stage. A place where repressed hunger and cruelty swirl.

II. THE JAR AS DOMESTIC HAUNT (1972)

Something Evil – Spielberg’s TV folk horror

The jar moves indoors. It no longer belongs to the carnival but the colonial farmhouse, filled with red slime and whispers. It infects the family hearth, makes the cradle rattle, and drags the suburbs into pagan soil.

The early ’70s were a time when Americans feared the collapse of domestic order—divorce rates climbing, cult headlines splashing, pesticides seeping into the ground. Spielberg takes the jar and says: this is the poison in your living room.

Unlike Bradbury’s ambiguity, Spielberg makes it explicit: this jar is evil. A demon battery. A spirit sink. You can’t interpret it freely—you can only survive its seeping influence.

Here the jar is a curse. The hearth turned septic.

III. THE JAR AS MIND-ROT (1984)

The Jar – Toscano’s VHS fever dream

By the time we hit the Reagan years, the jar is no longer carnival or farmhouse. It has climbed inside the psyche. The protagonist stares into it and sees his own unraveling. The jar controls his thoughts, mutates his body, destabilizes his sanity.

This is the VHS era of addiction, self-help tapes, night sweats under Reagan’s war on the poor. The jar becomes an allegory for the brain in captivity—pickled, trembling, dissolved in whatever fluid the culture secretes.

No longer spectacle. No longer curse. The jar is now inside. A parasite. A symptom.

THE CONTINUUM

Across these texts, the jar shifts function but not essence. It remains sealed, opaque, untouchable. It’s less an object than a narrative hinge—a container for whatever era most fears:

  • 1964: The grotesque within community.

  • 1972: The evil infiltrating family.

  • 1984: The madness consuming self.

The jar is an occult archetype. A vessel for anxiety. An eternal prop that outlives its contents.

Final notation:
Every age has its jar. We carry them in attics, in film stock, in memory. The jar is cinema’s recurring dream of containment—an impossible hope that dread can be bottled, labeled, placed on a shelf. But the seal is never perfect. Something always seeps out.

JAROLOGY

A selective timeline of sealed vessels, bottled horrors, and glass-bound enigmas

1920s–30s: The Specimen Age

  • H. P. Lovecraft – “The Colour Out of Space” (1927): Not a jar per se, but the poisoned well becomes a communal container of contamination.

  • Carnival & sideshows: Two-headed fetuses, pickled snakes, dime-museum grotesques in cloudy jars—a real-world proto-text for Bradbury.

1940s: The Bradbury Original

  • Ray Bradbury – “The Jar” (1944): Depression-era Louisiana fairgrounds, a farmer buys the unclassifiable specimen. It becomes a Rorschach for the community.

1960s: The Jar Goes Broadcast

  • Alfred Hitchcock Hour – “The Jar” (1964): Bradbury’s tale visualized for network TV. The jar becomes an object of small-town obsession.

1970s: The Domestic Curse

  • Something Evil (1972, Spielberg): A red-fluid jar in a farmhouse, vessel of demons. The jar goes suburban.

  • Don’t Look Now (1973): Though not a jar, the Venetian seance glasses and spirit vessels echo containment-of-the-unknown.

1980s: VHS Containment

  • The Jar (1984): The horror moves inside the psyche—mind-control, madness, body-horror in a jar.

  • Re-Animator (1985): Severed head kept alive with glowing serum. The line between lab jar and living tissue dissolves.

1990s: The X-Files Era

  • The X-Files (1993–2002): Countless jars—alien embryos, black oil vials, pickled curios in government vaults. The jar as bureaucratic fetish.

2000s–2010s: Pop-Culture Parody & Persistence

  • Futurama (1999–): Celebrity heads in jars—grotesque and comic, turning the specimen into talk-show guest.

  • Rick and Morty – “Pickle Rick” (2017): A riff on containment and transformation, parodying the seriousness of jarred specimens.

2020s: The Digital Vessel

  • NFTs & cloud storage: The jar mutates into servers, blockchains, and drives—sealed containers of meaning with no visible content. The new horror: jars without glass.

RECURRING FUNCTIONS

  • Spectacle (sideshow, Hitchcock)

  • Curse (Spielberg)

  • Madness (Toscano)

  • Control (X-Files, Futurama)

  • Parody (Rick & Morty)

  • Abstraction (NFTs as jars of nothing)

🜛 Conclusion: The jar is an eternal prop. From carnival pickles to cloud servers, it always holds what we fear can’t be named. The more opaque the contents, the stronger the projection.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Night Brings Charlie: An Analysis and Review

Image
There’s a certain grit to The Night Brings Charlie , a low-budget slash through the fogged-up window of late-’80s slasher cinema. You don’t watch it; you stumble into it, like a roadside dive at last call, half-expecting regret, half-hoping for salvation. The film itself is the cinematic equivalent of a rusted blade—coarse, unapologetic, and more effective than it has any right to be. Directed by Tom Logan, this is no highbrow deconstruction of the genre, no satirical smirk. It’s a grimy piece of work, a slash-and-dash pulp novel in celluloid form, as honest in its ambition as it is shameless in its execution. Our killer, Charlie Puckett, is an enigmatic silhouette. A landscaper turned murderer, wielding a tree-trimming mask and hedge clippers with a kind of perverse solemnity. He is less man, more myth—a shadow painted in broad strokes, purposefully vague yet somehow indelible. Like Tosches’ portrait of Dean Martin as a ghost haunting his own myth, Charlie looms larger ...
Read more

Saturday Morning Cereal: Welcome Freshmen & Student Bodies

Saturday morning, bowl of sugary cereal in hand, flipping channels between cartoons and live-action weirdness, because that was peak ‘90s TV. Somewhere between Doug and Are You Afraid of the Dark?, Nickelodeon tossed out Welcome Freshmen, and a few years later, the world gave us Student Bodies. Two shows about high school, but completely different flavors—one like a slapstick gum commercial, the other like a comic book that accidentally got cool. Welcome Freshmen (1991-1993): Nickelodeon’s Half-Sketch, Half-Sitcom Brainchild First season? A fever dream. Skits, absurd teachers, surreal school nonsense—almost like You Can’t Do That on Television had a cousin who got detention for being too weird. Then suddenly, someone in a suit said, “Let’s make this a real sitcom,” and—bam!—we had a slightly goofier, low-budget Saved by the Bell. It was messy, it was awkward, but wasn’t that what being a freshman felt like? The humor was that weird, random early-'90s Nickelodeon energy where everyt...
Read more

End Of Year for the Wasted Wanderer Without A Name

Ah, breaking the cycle. The phrase itself is deceptively simple, isn’t it? Two words, innocuous on their own, but together they sound like a hammer on an anvil, like a declaration of war against...what exactly? The ghosts of family dinners past, the chain-smoking uncle with his cryptic wisdom, the matriarch who ruled her home with an iron will and a ladle? The sins of the father, as they say, but not just his—also the grudges of the mother, the envy of the cousin, the apathy of the sibling. And somehow, these legacies, tangled as fishing nets, fall into your lap. It starts small. You’re 8 years old, standing in the living room as your parents argue for the fifth time that week. You think, "When I grow up, I’ll never shout like that." Fast forward, and there you are, 30 years old, voice hoarse, trying to explain why you’re late for dinner again. The cycle, it seems, has you in its grip. It’s not some grand Shakespearean curse, but rather the quiet, relentless habits that seep ...
Read more